• HOME
  • LIBRARY
  • CLIENT
    PORTAL
  • UNCLAIMED
    BENEFITS
  • CONTACT
  
Issued May 2024
 
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.   
 
In this newsletter...
  Benchtest 04.2024, the emerging global conflict and Africa, housing loans, the value of the Rand and more...  
 
Jump to...
     
  IMPORTANT NOTES AND REMINDERS
 
  NAMFISA levies
  • Funds with May 2024 year-ends must submit their 2nd levy returns and payments by 24 June 2024;
  • Funds with November 2024 year-ends must submit their 1st levy returns and payments by 24 June 2024;
  • and funds with May 2023 year-ends must submit their final levy returns and payments by 28 May 2024.
Repo rate unchanged in May

After its April meeting, BON announced that the repo rate remains unchanged at 7.75%. The interest rate on funds’ direct loans remains at 11.75%.

Registered service providers

Certain pension fund service providers must register with NAMFISA and report to NAMFISA. Download a list of service providers registered as of June 2023, here...
  Retirement calculator

Use our web-based retirement and risk shortfall calculator for your personal retirement planning. Find it here...

If you need help with your financial planning, get in touch with RFS Financial Advisers (Pty) Ltd.
  • Annemarie Nel (061-446 073)
  • Christina Linge (061-446 075)
  • Dennis Fabianus (061-446 098)
Toolbox for trustees

RFS provides comprehensive support for trustees. Find a list of downloadable documents to assist with governance and management of private funds, registered as of June 2023, here...
 
  
IN THIS NEWSLETTER...
 
 
In this newsletter, we address the following topics:
 
 
 
In 'Tilman Friedrich's industry forum' we present...
  • Monthly review of portfolio performance – 30 April 2024
  • Africa’s role in the emerging global conflict: implications and strategies for Namibia and Africa
  • Employer guaranteed housing loans – a real-life scenario
  • What is the actual value of the Rand
In Compliments, read...
  • A compliment from an employee benefits consultant
In ‘Benchmark: A note from Günter Pfeifer, read about…
  • Benchmark trustees hold a strategy session
In 'News from RFS', read about...
  • Long service complements our business philosophy
    The Retirement Compass
    RFS staff support Môreson Special School fun walk
    Important circulars issued by RFS
In news from NAMFISA, read about...
  • Circular on block submissions of rule amendments  
  • Changes to ERS and chart of accounts
  In ‘News from RFIN”, read about …
  • The RFIN training calendar
In 'Legal snippets', read about...
  • Withholding of benefit for dishonesty and fraud
In 'Snippets for the pension funds industry,' read about...
  • Nine habits for becoming truly happy in retirement
  • Middle East conflict and market responses: what does it mean for investors?
In ‘Snippets of general interest', read about...
  • How to build lasting customer relationships
  • How much money is enough, and at what point does it stop making you happier
And make a point of reading what our clients say about us in the ‘Compliments’ section. It should give you a good appreciation of who and what we are!

As always, your comment is welcome, so open a new mail and drop us a note!

Regards
Tilman Friedrich
 
 
TILMAN FRIEDRICH'S INDUSTRY FORUM
  
Monthly Review of Portfolio Performance
to 30 April 2024
  
  In March 2024, the average prudential balanced portfolio returned 1.3% (February 2024: 0.7%). The top performer is Allan Gray Balanced Fund, with 2.0%, while Lebela Balanced Fund, with 0.5%, takes the bottom spot. Namibia Coronation Capital Plus Fund takes the top spot for the three months, outperforming the ‘average’ by roughly 1.7%. Lebela Balanced Fund underperformed the ‘average’ by 1.6% on the other end of the scale. Note that these returns are before (gross of) asset management fees.

The Monthly Review of Portfolio Performance to 30 April 2024 reviews portfolio performances and provides insightful analyses.  Download it here...
 
 
Africa’s role in the emerging global conflict: implications and strategies for Namibia and Africa
  
  The world is teetering on the brink of a potentially devastating conflict as the geopolitical landscape shifts from a unipolar world dominated by the United States to a multipolar world championed by Russia, China, and the other BRICS countries. The Ukraine conflict and tensions in the South China Sea are manifestations of this struggle, with the US seeking to contain and wear down Russia and China’s economic and military capabilities to preserve its hegemony. As these global powers jockey for position, Africa, specifically Namibia, will inevitably be drawn into the fray. This article explores how the impending global conflict might affect Africa, specifically Namibia…

Read on in paragraph 6 of the Monthly Review of Portfolio Performance to 30 April 2024. It also reviews portfolio performances and provides insightful analyses.

Download the Monthly Review, here...
 
  
Employer guaranteed housing loans – a real-life scenario
 
  1. The employer’s housing loan scheme 

The scenario in this article is that the employer offers housing loans to its employees under an employment policy. A local commercial bank provides the housing loans, and the employer provides a surety to the bank for a specified portion of the loan. The employee must complete an application form. The employee certifies that he has acquainted himself with the scheme’s rules and subjects himself to the scheme conditions.
 
The surety agreement between the bank and the employer requires the employer to pay the bank the value of the outstanding loan up to the value of the surety it gave when the employee’s service terminates. The rules contain a schedule of benefits that quantifies the withdrawal, retirement, death and disability benefits. The fund’s rules explicitly allow benefit deductions for compensating the employer regarding damage caused to the employer, medical aid and insurance premiums and any other purpose approved by the Registrar. The rules further authorise the fund to grant housing loan guarantees for the purpose referred to in PFA section 19(5)(a).
 
2. The Pension Funds Act on housing loans 

The PFA section 37D(b)(i)(bb) states that the fund (of which the employee was a member) “… may deduct any amount due by a member to his employer on the date of his retirement or on which he ceases to be a member of the fund, in respect of any amount for which the employer is liable under a guarantee furnished in respect of a loan by some other person (the bank in this scenario) to the member for any purpose referred to in section 19(5)(a) … from any benefit payable in respect of the member or a beneficiary in terms of the rules of the fund, and pay such amount to the employer concerned.”
 
PFA section 37A prohibits the reduction, transfer, cession, pledge or hypothecation of the member’s benefit and protects the benefit from attachment or execution except as provided in this section. One of the exceptions is the deduction per section 37D(b)(i)(bb) cited above.
 
The PFA, therefore, requires that the benefit must be paid to the member and nobody but the member.
 
3. The employer, the member and NAMFISA’s position on the member’s complaint 

Under the agreement with the bank, the employer was obliged to pay up the surety value. It approached the fund to deduct its surety payment from the member’s benefit. The member objected and complained to NAMFISA that he never expressly consented to the deduction from his benefit. NAMFISA advised the fund that it may not deduct the benefit because the rules have no explicit provision mandating the trustees to deduct the employer’s surety payment.
 
4. Must the rules authorise trustees to withhold the employer’s housing loan surety? 

While sections 37A and 37B offer exceptional protection to members’ benefits, section 37A makes a few exceptions. It allows the following:
  1. Deductions permitted by the Income Tax Act.
  2. Deductions permitted by the Maintenance Act.
  3. Deductions explicitly allowed by the PFA. 
Section 28 (5) of the Maintenance Act stipulates, “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, any pension, annuity or compassionate allowance or other similar benefit is liable to be attached or subjected to execution under a warrant of execution or an order issued or made under this Part [Part VII – Enforcement of Maintenance Orders] to satisfy a maintenance order by the Maintenance Court. A maintenance order is insufficient for the attachment of a pension benefit. It requires a warrant of execution or an attachment order of a maintenance court.
 
Schedule 2 of the Income Tax Act requires the deduction of income tax on any benefit defined as gross income and for the tax debt of the member as instructed by NamRA under section 91.
 
The only permitted deductions under the PFA are provided in section 37D. Amongst the permissible deductions are housing loans. Sections 37D(a)(i) and (ii) deal with direct (fund granted) and indirect (fund guaranteed) loans. These sections do not apply to the scenario sketched in this article. Section 37D(b)(i)(aa) deals with housing loans granted by the employer. Section 37D(b)(i)(bb) deals with “any amount for which the employer is liable under a guarantee furnished in respect of a loan by some other person (the bank) to the member for any purpose referred to in section 19(5)(a) to an amount not exceeding the amount which in terms of the Income Tax Act, 1962, may be taken by a member or beneficiary as a lump sum benefit as defined in the Second Schedule to that Act;” In our scenario the employer was liable for its guarantee to the bank. Provided the bank made the loan for the purpose referred to in section 19(5)(a), section 37(D)(b)(i)(bb) allows the fund to deduct the employer’s surety payment. The section has no other precondition. Unlike section 19(5)(a), which says that loans may only be granted if the rules allow it, it does not require that the rules permit the deduction. This section also does not require the member to consent to the deduction, unlike in the case of a deduction for theft, fraud, dishonesty or misconduct without a court judgment. In our scenario, the rules permit housing loans but do not explicitly speak about benefit deductions for housing loans.
 
5. May the fund pay directly into the member’s loan account? 

After NAMFISA advised the fund that it may not deduct the benefit, the question arose of whether the fund could pay the employer’s surety amount directly into the member’s housing loan account as it is the member’s account. The fact that a commercial bank maintains such an account of the member’s housing loan debt does not make the account the member’s property on which he can transact as he wishes. The account is merely the bank’s record of the member’s debt. Therefore, the fund paying the member’s benefit into his housing loan account does not constitute a payment to the member and would contravene section 37A.
 
6. Does section 19(5) impact the fund’s ability to withhold the employer’s surety payment?
 
Section 19(5) sets out the purposes for which a fund may grant a housing loan or guarantee and other obligatory terms and conditions where the fund would grant the loan or give a guarantee to the bank. It does not refer to Section 37D and is irrelevant to the fund’s ability to deduct under Section 37D. It also does not speak about an employer-granted housing loan or guarantee as iis the case in the scenario sketched in this article.
 
 
What is the actual value of the Rand?
 
  Our monthly Benchmark performance review contains graph 5.1, copied below, that tracks the actual value of the Rand.
 
There are many ways of determining its actual value. We measure the true value by adjusting the exchange rate from the starting point with the difference in the US vs Namibian inflation rate.
 
Businesstech had an article on 30 January, ‘The ‘real’ value of the Rand in 2024 – according to the Big Mac Index’. It is interesting to compare the results.

The Economist’s updated Big Mac Index for 2024 indicates that the South African Rand is significantly undervalued against the US dollar.

Overview of the Big Mac Index
  • Purpose: Measures whether currencies are priced correctly based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP).
  • Method: Compares the cost of a Big Mac in different countries to assess exchange rates.
  • Relevance: It is not a precise measure but a widely accepted tool for understanding currency misalignment.
Findings for 2024

Raw PPP Measure:
  • Big Mac price: R51.90 in South Africa vs. $5.69 in the US.
    • Implied exchange rate: R9.12 to $1.
    • Actual exchange rate during the study: R19.19 to $1.
    • Conclusion: The Rand is 52.5% undervalued, making it the 4th most undervalued currency.
  • Adjusted Index (GDP per Capita Consideration):
    • Big Mac cost in PPP terms: US$2.71 in South Africa vs. US$5.69 in the US.
    • Adjusted fair value based on GDP: R11.32 to $1.
    • Conclusion: Rand is 41% undervalued, ranking 6th in undervaluation.
Implications
  • The findings suggest that the Rand is far below its “real” value, influenced by economic and local conditions, risk premiums, and global market sentiment.
  • Local issues such as energy crises and infrastructural problems significantly affect the Rand’s value.
Conclusion
 
Despite accounting for GDP differences, the Rand remains substantially undervalued, with broader economic and policy factors contributing to its weakened state. The Big Mac Index offers a simplified yet insightful perspective on currency valuation, highlighting the disparity between the market exchange rate and the implied fair value of the Rand.
 
Graph 5.1 shows that if one starts measuring the US vs Namibia inflation rate differential from the beginning of 1987, the Rand’s real value should be 11.77, as opposed to the official exchange rate of 18.69. The Big Mac index, adjusted by the GDP per capita consideration, arrives at an actual value of 11.32.

 
Graph 5.1

 
 
COMPLIMENT
 
 
Compliment from an Employee Benefit Consultant
August 2023
 
“Goodness gracious, but that was quick!!!
Thanks, G and RFS team!”

 
 
  
 
Read more comments and compliments from our clients, here...
 
  
BENCHMARK: A NOTE FROM GÜNTER PFEIFER
 
Benchmark trustees hold a strategy session
 
 
The Benchmark Retirement Fund trustees convened for a fruitful strategy session at Am Weinberg on Friday, 17 May. Mr Eben de Klerk, a highly qualified expert holding various degrees and post-graduate qualifications, including a Master's degree in future studies, acted as the facilitator.
 
 
   
 
Important circulars issued by the Fund
 
  The Benchmark Retirement Fund issued no new circular since the newsletter 202309 – changes to survivor annuity investments.

Clients are welcome to contact us if they require a copy of any circular.
 
 
NEWS FROM RFS
  
Long service awards complement our business philosophy
  
 
RFS places a high value on its employees and recognises the importance of their contributions to the company’s success. Long service awards are a great way to acknowledge and celebrate the commitment and loyalty of employees who have been with the company for a significant time.

In addition to recognising employees’ contributions, long service awards can be a powerful retention tool, demonstrating that the company values and appreciates its employees’ dedication and hard work. These awards create a positive and motivating work environment where employees feel supported and encouraged to continue to grow and develop within the company.
 
In May, RFS celebrated the following anniversaries:
  • Vernon Petersen, tenth anniversary on 1 May 2024; and
  • Elray Goreseb, fifth anniversary on 15 May 2024.
We sincerely thank our two fund accountants, Vernon and Elray, for their dedication, loyalty, and support over the years since joining RFS. We look forward to their contribution to the good of RFS, our clients, and our colleagues in the future!
 
 
The RETIREMENT COMPASS
  
 
Read the latest version of the Retirement Compass here...
 
 
RFS staff support Môreson Special School fun walk
  
  The Môreson fun walk for inclusivity took place on Saturday, 27 April. Through their participation in the Môreson Special School fun walk, RFS staff made a meaningful difference in the lives of the special needs school children. The event was a huge success, and judging from the angelic smiles on the faces of those who took part in the walk, the impact was noticeable. RFS staff collected N$2,400, which was used to purchase much-needed toiletries for the children and stocked the water points with water, cooldrinks and oranges. These, along with the seizable amount of toiletry items collected from staff on the ground, were handed to the Môreson staff, who extended their heartfelt appreciation for the generous donation.
 
The photos below give an impression of the spirit prevailing at the fun walk.
 
 
   
  On the road again…  
 
 
   
 
Rudigar van Wyk with his daughter.
  Martha Nakaambo (l) and Hilde Towe (r) with their children.  
 
Important circulars issued by RFS
  
  RFS issued the following circulars:
  • RFS 2024.04-02 – Office Closure
  • RFS 2024.05-03 – Administration System Progress Update
Clients are welcome to contact us if they require a copy of any circular.
 
NEWS FROM NAMFISA
  
Circular on block submissions of rule amendments
  
 
NAMFISA issued Circular PI/PF/DIR/01/2024 on 3 May 2024. The directive aims to streamline amending pension fund rules to ensure operational efficiency and clarity. Here’s a breakdown of its key points:
  1. The Law
    • Section 12 of the PF Act governs rule amendments, requiring approval by the Registrar.
    • Funds must comply with Section 12(2) by submitting resolutions for rule alterations or additions within one month to the Registrar.
    • The directive ensures compliance with these legal requirements.
  2. Block Periods for Submission and Assessment of Rule Amendments:
    • Two block periods are established for submitting and assessing rule amendment applications.
    • Block 1 runs from 1 May to 1 July for submission, with assessment from 1 May to 31 July.
    • Block 2 runs from 1 September to 15 December for submission, with assessment from 1 September to 31 January of the following year.
    • Urgent applications may be accepted outside these periods under certain circumstances.
  3. Accompanying Documentation:
    • Rule amendment applications must be made via the Electronic Regulatory System and comply with relevant laws and directives.
    • Required documentation includes amended rules, board resolutions, and a special report by the valuator if the amendment affects the fund’s financial position.
    • Additional documentation is required if member benefits are or may be negatively affected.
  4. Application of the Directive:
    • The directive applies to all registered pension funds.
    • It does not apply to certain processes like new fund registrations or rule consolidations.
    • The directive takes effect on 3 May 2024.
 
 
Changes to ERS and chart of accounts
  
 
When compiling the quarterly reports on the Electronic Regulatory System (ERS) and the chart of accounts (COA) for March, which were due by 25 April, RFS realised that changes were made to the ERS and COA. Upon enquiry, NAMFISA confirmed changing the system.
 
It then issued a circular dated 23 April 2024, informing the pension funds industry about significant changes it made to the ERS and chart of accounts for pension funds.

If you missed the Circular, download it here…
 
 
NEWS FROM RFIN
  
RFIN’s trustee training calendar
  
 
The RFIN website is a valuable resource for pension fund trustees and other industry stakeholders. It will be worth your while rummaging around on it here…

If you missed the RFIN’s latest quarterly newsletter, find it here…
 
LEGAL SNIPPETS
   
Withholding of benefit for dishonesty and fraud
  
  This article deals with the case NI Jonck (“complainant”) v Retail and Allied Employees Provident Fund (“fund”) and HR Focus (Pty) Ltd (“employer”).
 
Background

The case involves the withholding of NI Jonck’s withdrawal benefit by the fund at the request of her employer under section 37D(1)(b)(ii) of the Pension Funds Act [theft, fraud, dishonesty or misconduct].

The Complaint

The complainant resigned on 2 June 2021, citing gross mistreatment and abuse from the employer, and referred the dispute to the CCMA. She contacted the fund regarding the payment of her withdrawal benefit but was informed that no payment would be made due to ongoing legal proceedings initiated by the employer. The employer had summoned her for allegations of gross dishonesty and fraud.
The complainant’s attorneys contested that no judgment had been granted against her, nor had she admitted liability. Thus, the fund should not withhold her benefit.

Undisputed Facts
  1. The employer employed the complainant from 3 July 2014 to 6 February 2021 and was a member of the fund since May 2015.
  2. The last contribution to the fund was made on 31 May 2021.
  3. A completed withdrawal form was submitted on 25 June 2021.
  4. The complainant’s fund credit amounted to R58,828.01.
  5. The employer opened a case (Case No. 289/07/2021) against the complainant for alleged misconduct and fraud.
  6. The employer sought damages of R36,950.00.
Disputed Arguments

Complainant’s Arguments
  1. The complainant claimed constructive dismissal due to mistreatment and abuse by the employer, leading to her resignation and referral of the matter to the CCMA.
  2. She alleged conflicting information from the fund regarding the status of her claim forms and the withholding of her benefit.
  3. The complainant highlighted that no judgment had been made against her, nor had she admitted liability. She described the settlement agreement proposed by the employer as coercive and coming immediately after her attorneys’ complaint letter.
  4. She contended that withholding her benefit was unjustified and sought an investigation by the Adjudicator.
Fund’s Arguments
  1. The fund acted upon notification from the employer about the pending legal action and misconduct allegations against the complainant.
  2. According to the fund’s rules, it withheld the complainant’s benefits pending the determination of liability, as requested by the employer.
  3. The board reviewed the matter on 21 September 2021 and decided to monitor the progress of legal action and ensure timely resolution.
Employer’s Arguments
  1. The employer argued that the fund is permitted to withhold the complainant’s benefit under section 37D(1)(b)(ii) pending the outcome of legal proceedings.
  2. The employer claimed that the complainant mishandled rental collections, causing a loss of R36,950.00. The legal case and police report substantiated the allegations.
  3. The employer justified the settlement agreement as a fair opportunity for the complainant to admit liability and avoid further legal costs.
  4. Investigation Meeting: The employer stated that the complainant did not attend an investigation meeting where she could have contested the fraud allegations, implying her guilt.
The Adjudicator’s Findings and Rationale
  1. Section 37D(1)(b)(ii) Application:
    The Adjudicator noted that for the fund to withhold the benefit under section 37D(1)(b)(ii) of the Pension Funds Act, there must either be a court judgment against the member or a written admission of liability by the member. In this case, neither condition was met: there was no court judgment against the complainant, nor had she admitted liability.
  2. Review of the Board’s Decision:
    The Adjudicator found that the fund’s board failed to apply its mind to the matter properly. The board acted mainly on the employer’s request without sufficiently considering the complainant’s side in the absence of a court judgment or admission of liability. Not considering the complainant’s side indicated that the board did not fulfil its duty to balance the interests of both the employer and the complainant.
  3. Audi Alteram Partem Principle:
    The Adjudicator stressed that the fund’s board should have followed the principle of audi alteram partem (hear the other side) by informing the complainant of the employer’s request to withhold her benefit and allowing her to present her case. This procedural fairness was not observed, undermining the justification for withholding the benefit.
  4. Unjustified Withholding:
    Lack of Prompt Legal Steps:

    The employer did not take timely and adequate legal steps to obtain a court judgment against the complainant. The Adjudicator noted that initiating legal proceedings was insufficient; progress must be made towards a judgment.
    Implications for Withholding Benefits:
    Due to the employer’s delay and insufficient legal actions, the fund could not justifiably withhold the complainant’s benefits based on section 37D(1)(b)(ii). The Adjudicator emphasised that withholding was not legally supported without a court judgment or an admission of liability.
Conclusion:

The Adjudicator ordered the fund to pay the complainant’s withdrawal benefit, highlighting that the legal action taken by the employer did not meet the necessary criteria under section 37D(1)(b)(ii) to justify the withholding of her benefit. The Adjudicator emphasised the need for a balanced and fair process, which the fund’s board had failed to provide.
 
Read the determination here…
 
SNIPPETS FOR THE PENSION FUND INDUSTRY
 
Nine habits for becoming truly happy in retirement
 
  Retirement is often perceived as a time of freedom and relaxation, yet it comes with challenges and uncertainties for many. However, some seem to have mastered the art of retirement, radiating genuine happiness in their golden years. What’s their secret? It turns out they’ve embraced specific daily habits that keep them thriving. Here is a summary of these nine habits adopted by men who find true happiness in retirement. 
  1. Embrace Routine: Structure brings purpose and stability. Establish simple daily habits for rhythm without rigidity.
  2. Stay Active: Physical activity boosts energy and happiness. Find enjoyable ways to stay moving every day.
  3. Keep Learning: Continuous learning keeps the mind sharp. Explore new hobbies or skills to stay engaged.
  4. Stay Socially Connected: Strong relationships foster happiness. Spend time with loved ones and engage in community activities.
  5. Practice Mindfulness: Being present reduces stress. Incorporate moments of mindfulness into daily life.
  6. Cherish Relationships: Quality time with loved ones enriches life. Treasure shared moments for lasting happiness.
  7. Make Time for Self-Care: Prioritise activities that recharge you. Dedicate time for relaxation and reflection.
  8. Embrace Change: Adaptability leads to growth. Embrace new experiences with an open mind.
  9. Live with Gratitude: Appreciate the blessings of retirement. Focus on what you have to find joy in everyday life. 
Read the full article by Ethan Sterling in Global English Editing of 30 April 2024 here…
 
    
Middle East conflict and market responses: what does it mean for investors?
 
  This article discusses recent events in the Middle East and their implications for global markets. The discussions in the article reveal a nuanced understanding of the shifting alliances in the Middle East. General Sir Nick Carter points out Iran’s alliances with Russia and North Korea, suggesting a potential anti-Western coalition. Additionally, he highlights China’s cautious approach and Russia’s engagement with Hamas, indicating a complex web of relationships in the region.
 
Schroders investment experts, represented by Duncan Lamont and Matthew Michael, anticipate spikes in market volatility primarily due to the risk of oil supply disruptions from the Middle East. They also identify investor behaviour, such as seeking safe havens like gold, contributing to potential market fluctuations. However, they argue that historical precedent suggests markets recover swiftly after geopolitical crises, implying a degree of resilience.
 
By emphasising the need for cautious market assessment, the experts suggest that investors carefully evaluate the geopolitical landscape’s impact on market fundamentals and avoid knee-jerk reactions. This approach involves analysing the broader context of geopolitical events, considering historical patterns, and assessing the long-term implications for investment strategies. It advocates for a measured and strategic approach to navigating market uncertainties arising from geopolitical developments in the Middle East.
 
Read the article in Cover of 7 May 2024 here…
 
 
SNIPPETS OF GENERAL INTEREST
  
How to build lasting customer relationships
  
  In the face of rising living costs and limited disposable incomes, financial services and insurance products are often the first to be cut from household budgets. For financial service providers (FSPs), building strong client-advisor relationships and fostering customer loyalty is crucial, especially in challenging economic environments.

Strategies for Improving Customer Loyalty

FSPs must evaluate their current practices to identify shortcomings and implement strategies to enhance client retention. Key recommendations include:
  1. Understanding Diverse Client Needs: A one-size-fits-all approach is ineffective. Clients value personalised attention and solutions tailored to their unique needs.
  2. Personalised Attention: FSPs should focus on actively listening to clients, segmenting their client base, investing in comprehensive client profiling, and conducting regular needs assessments to review and update financial plans.
Prioritising these strategies can help FSPs establish trust, nurture loyalty, and ensure clients receive the individualised attention they deserve.

Read the article by Danielle Wassermann in the April edition of the Cover web magazine here…
 
 
How much money is enough, and at what point does it stop making you happier?
  
 
This article emphasises that while money can increase happiness up to a certain point, its impact diminishes beyond specific income levels, with significant policy implications for addressing social inequities.

Key Points:
  1. Money and Happiness
    • Many people believe having enough money to be comfortable would make them happy, but the definition of “enough” varies.
    • Steven Boykey Sidley discusses the income level at which additional money ceases to increase happiness.
  2. Kahneman’s Research:
    • Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman found that happiness increases with income up to about $75,000 per year (2010 data), equivalent to $107,500 today.
    • Beyond this income level, additional money has little impact on happiness.
  3. Recent Findings:
    • Newer studies show happiness gains from $100,000 to $200,000 in annual income, but higher increments (e.g., $400,000 to $800,000) are needed for similar happiness increases as income grows.
  4. Diminishing Returns:
    • As income rises, the incremental gains in happiness become smaller.
  5. Policy Implications:
    • Podcaster Scott Galloway suggests that doubling taxes on incomes over $10 million annually would not significantly reduce happiness but could generate substantial revenue to address social issues.
    • In South Africa, doubling taxes on those earning over R5 million per year could generate R30 billion, potentially alleviating many social problems if spent wisely.
This article by Paula Luckhoff appeared in Eyewitness News on 23 April 2024 here...
 
 
AND FINALLY...
  
Wise words from wise men
  
  The insights of ancient philosophers still resonate today and offer timeless wisdom on the relationship between money, virtue, and well-being.

“Excessive wealth can lead to corruption, inequality, and a focus on material possessions rather than the pursuit of virtue and wisdom.”

~ Plato (428 BC – 348 BC)
 
  
  
  Unsubscribe
If you do not want to receive these newsletters {unsubscribe}click here...{/unsubscribe}

Disclaimer
Whilst we have taken all reasonable measures to ensure that the results reflected herein are correct, Benchmark Retirement Fund and RFS Fund Administrators (Pty) Ltd do not accept any liability for the accuracy of the information and no decision should be taken on the basis of the information contained herein before confirming the detail with the relevant portfolio manager.
 
  
PENSION CALCULATOR
How much will you need when you retire and are you investing enough?
GALLERY
CLIENT COM(PLI)MENTS
FREE INVESTMENT AND PENSION FUND NEWS
Subscribe now to receive our monthly newsletter.
We use cookies to make this site simpler. By using this site, you permit the use of cookies.
More information Ok